1965 Renault 4 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 4 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 470 more horse power than 1965 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1965 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Renault 4 | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Renault | Jaguar |
Model | 4 | XK |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4794 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1322 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2752 mm |