1965 Renault 8 vs. 1962 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1965 Renault 8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Triumph Vitesse (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Triumph Vitesse weights approximately 166 kg more than 1965 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Renault 8 | 1962 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | 8 | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 955 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 906 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2330 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 29 L |
