1965 Renault 8 vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1965 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Renault 8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Renault 8 | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Renault | Nissan |
Model | 8 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 955 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |