1965 Renault 8 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 311 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 653 kg more than 1965 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Renault 8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Renault 8 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Renault | Jeep |
Model | 8 | Commander |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 955 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 358 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1393 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 80 L |