1965 Riley Kestrel vs. 2006 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 215 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 553 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Riley Kestrel | 2006 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Riley | Volvo |
Model | Kestrel | XC90 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 84 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1438 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2720 mm |