1965 Riley Kestrel vs. 2009 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2009 Renault Symbol is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Symbol is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Symbol (74 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Symbol should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Symbol weights approximately 115 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Symbol (105 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm). This means 2009 Renault Symbol will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Riley Kestrel | 2009 Renault Symbol | |
| Make | Riley | Renault |
| Model | Kestrel | Symbol |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2473 mm |
