1965 Riley Kestrel vs. 2010 Renault Thalia
To start off, 2010 Renault Thalia is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Thalia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Thalia (97 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Thalia should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Thalia weights approximately 115 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Thalia (127 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm). This means 2010 Renault Thalia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Riley Kestrel | 2010 Renault Thalia | |
Make | Riley | Renault |
Model | Kestrel | Thalia |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 84 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2473 mm |