1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2000 Toyota Avalon
To start off, 2000 Toyota Avalon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 419 kg more than 2000 Toyota Avalon.
Because 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Avalon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2000 Toyota Avalon | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
Model | Silver Cloud | Avalon |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6230 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1681 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.4 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 60 L |