1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2009 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2009 Nissan Navara is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 68 kg more than 2009 Nissan Navara.
Because 2009 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2009 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Nissan |
| Model | Silver Cloud | Navara |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 16.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 2032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 80 L |
