1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2010 Audi S8
To start off, 2010 Audi S8 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 925 kg more than 2010 Audi S8.
Because 2010 Audi S8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi S8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2010 Audi S8 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Audi |
Model | Silver Cloud | S8 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6230 cc | 5204 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 450 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 12.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 5070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.4 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 90 L |