1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2006 Toyota Tacoma
To start off, 2006 Toyota Tacoma is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 745 kg more than 2006 Toyota Tacoma.
Because 2006 Toyota Tacoma is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tacoma will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2006 Toyota Tacoma | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Tacoma |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 2701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 159 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 79 L |
