1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 882 kg more than 2010 Renault Clio.
Because 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Renault |
Model | Silver Shadow | Clio |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6230 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 55 L |