1965 Saab MC vs. 1972 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1972 Zastava 1300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Saab MC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Saab MC would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Saab MC (54 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Saab MC should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 92 kg more than 1965 Saab MC.
Because 1972 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Saab MC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Zastava 1300 (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Saab MC. (91 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1972 Zastava 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Saab MC.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Saab MC | 1972 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Saab | Zastava |
Model | MC | 1300 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 841 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 54 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 91 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 888 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2430 mm |