1965 Saab MC vs. 2010 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Stilo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Saab MC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Saab MC would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 377 kg more than 1965 Saab MC.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Saab MC. (91 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Saab MC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Saab MC | 2010 Fiat Stilo | |
| Make | Saab | Fiat |
| Model | MC | Stilo |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 841 cc | 2446 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 91 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 90.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 888 kg | 1265 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2610 mm |
