1965 Seat 1500 vs. 2009 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2009 Toyota Highlander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,456 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1965 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1965 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 524 kg more than 1965 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Seat 1500 | 2009 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Seat | Toyota |
Model | 1500 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 3456 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2800 mm |