1965 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2010 Ford Maverick is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,987 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Maverick (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1965 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Maverick should accelerate faster than 1965 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Maverick weights approximately 355 kg more than 1965 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Seat 1500 | 2010 Ford Maverick | |
Make | Seat | Ford |
Model | 1500 | Maverick |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2630 mm |