1965 Seat 600 vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Seat 600 | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Seat | Acura |
Model | 600 | TL |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 2500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2840 mm |