1965 Seat 600 vs. 2006 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Swift is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,490 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Swift is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Suzuki Swift weights approximately 481 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Swift (133 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Swift will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Seat 600 | 2006 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Seat | Suzuki |
Model | 600 | Swift |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 1490 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
Torque | 47 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1056 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2390 mm |