1965 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Ford Edge
To start off, 2010 Ford Edge is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Edge is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Edge weights approximately 1876 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Edge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Edge (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Edge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Seat 600 | 2010 Ford Edge | |
Make | Seat | Ford |
Model | 600 | Edge |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 3500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
Torque | 47 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2126 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3505 mm |