1965 Seat 600 vs. 2011 Acura CSX
To start off, 2011 Acura CSX is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Acura CSX weights approximately 738 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Acura CSX (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Acura CSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Seat 600 | 2011 Acura CSX | |
Make | Seat | Acura |
Model | 600 | CSX |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 2000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 47 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |