1965 Seat 600 vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Seat 600 | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Seat | Jaguar |
Model | 600 | XF |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 3000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 47 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2908 mm |