1965 Simca 1300 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1965 Simca 1300. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 Simca 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 474 kg more than 1965 Simca 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Simca 1300 | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Simca | Ford |
| Model | 1300 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1290 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2580 mm |
