1965 Skoda 1202 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1965 Skoda 1202. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1965 Skoda 1202.
Because 1965 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Skoda 1202. (84 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Skoda 1202 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Skoda | Holden |
| Model | 1202 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2685 mm |
