1965 Steyr 650T vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 1982 Audi 4000 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 4000 (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 650T.
Because 1982 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Steyr 650T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 4000 (137 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm). This means 1982 Audi 4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 650T. 1982 Audi 4000 has automatic transmission and 1965 Steyr 650T has manual transmission. 1965 Steyr 650T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Audi 4000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Steyr 650T | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Steyr | Audi |
Model | 650T | 4000 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 643 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 40 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 2970 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2550 mm |