1965 Steyr 650T vs. 2012 Audi S6

To start off, 2012 Audi S6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi S6 (414 HP) has 394 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 650T. (20 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 650T.

Because 2012 Audi S6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Steyr 650T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi S6 (500 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 460 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 650T.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Steyr 650T 2012 Audi S6
Make Steyr Audi
Model 650T S6
Year Released 1965 2012
Engine Size 643 cc 4000 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 20 HP 414 HP
Torque 40 Nm 500 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 1400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]