1965 Steyr 700C vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1380 kg more than 1965 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Steyr 700C | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Steyr | Toyota |
| Model | 700C | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 643 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3190 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1950 mm | 2830 mm |
