1965 Steyr 700C vs. 2010 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2010 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 700C.
Because 1965 Steyr 700C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Steyr 700C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (299 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Steyr 700C | 2010 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Steyr | Saab |
| Model | 700C | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 643 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 299 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3190 mm | 4646 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1950 mm | 2675 mm |
