1965 Sunbeam Alpine vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1965 Sunbeam Alpine is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Alpine. (91 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 140 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Sunbeam Alpine | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Sunbeam |
| Model | Alpine | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1723 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2190 mm |
