1965 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (200 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 440 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Sunbeam Tiger | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Sunbeam | Acura |
Model | Tiger | CL |
Year Released | 1965 | 1997 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 65 L |