1965 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (268 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1002 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Sunbeam Tiger | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Sunbeam | Volvo |
Model | Tiger | XC90 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 72 L |