1965 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 580 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Sunbeam Tiger | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Sunbeam | Toyota |
Model | Tiger | Tundra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |