1965 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 Lancia Phedra
To start off, 2010 Lancia Phedra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2010 Lancia Phedra. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2010 Lancia Phedra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lancia Phedra weights approximately 596 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lancia Phedra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 Lancia Phedra | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Lancia |
| Model | Tiger | Phedra |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1736 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 80 L |
