1965 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2010 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Sequoia (310 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1436 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Toyota |
| Model | Tiger | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 2576 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2027 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1895 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 3099 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 100 L |
