1965 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 311 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Volvo |
| Model | Tiger | C30 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 101 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |
