1965 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2011 Lotus Exige
To start off, 2011 Lotus Exige is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lotus Exige (257 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lotus Exige should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 231 kg more than 2011 Lotus Exige.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Sunbeam Tiger | 2011 Lotus Exige | |
Make | Sunbeam | Lotus |
Model | Tiger | Exige |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 909 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3797 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1727 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1158 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2299 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 44 L |