1965 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Clio weights approximately 35 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | 2011 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Renault |
| Model | Tiger | Clio |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1460 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 55 L |
