1965 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2012 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2012 Seat Exeo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2012 Seat Exeo. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2012 Seat Exeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Seat Exeo weights approximately 260 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Sunbeam Tiger | 2012 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Sunbeam | Seat |
Model | Tiger | Exeo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2642 mm |