1965 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2012 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2012 Subaru Forester is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2012 Subaru Forester. (145 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2012 Subaru Forester. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Forester weights approximately 410 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 2012 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Sunbeam Tiger | 2012 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Sunbeam | Subaru |
Model | Tiger | Forester |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4559 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1674 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2616 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 64 L |