1965 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1990 Toyota Starlet
To start off, 1990 Toyota Starlet is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Toyota Starlet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Toyota Starlet (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Toyota Starlet should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Toyota Starlet weights approximately 50 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Toyota Starlet (101 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1990 Toyota Starlet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Suzuki Fronte | 1990 Toyota Starlet | |
Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
Model | Fronte | Starlet |
Year Released | 1965 | 1990 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 1295 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2310 mm |