1965 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1570 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Suzuki Fronte | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Suzuki | Dodge |
| Model | Fronte | Ram |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 360 cc | 3906 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 2070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2790 mm |
