1965 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,493 cc (3 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 565 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (161 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Suzuki Fronte | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Suzuki | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fronte | Colt |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 360 cc | 1493 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 161 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 47 L |
