1965 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2009 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2009 Seat Exeo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Seat Exeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Seat Exeo (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Seat Exeo should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Seat Exeo weights approximately 640 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Seat Exeo (220 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Seat Exeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Suzuki Fronte | 2009 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Suzuki | Seat |
Model | Fronte | Exeo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 1781 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2642 mm |