1965 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2010 Fiat Panda is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Panda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Panda (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Panda weights approximately 453 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Panda (102 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Fiat Panda | |
| Make | Suzuki | Fiat |
| Model | Fronte | Panda |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 360 cc | 1242 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 953 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 3540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 35 L |
