1965 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (235 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1114 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Suzuki | Jaguar |
Model | Fronte | XJ |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 360 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 293 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1614 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 85 L |