1965 Toyota Crown vs. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1965 Toyota Crown. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1965 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 551 kg more than 1965 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Toyota Crown. (146 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Toyota Crown | 2004 Chevrolet Blazer | |
| Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
| Model | Crown | Blazer |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1897 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1806 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2720 mm |
