1965 Toyota Crown vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1965 Toyota Crown. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1965 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 493 kg more than 1965 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Toyota Crown. (146 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2011 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Toyota Crown | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Toyota | Cadillac |
| Model | Crown | CTS |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1897 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 270 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |
