1965 Triumph 2000 vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 1965 Triumph 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 120. (145 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Triumph 2000 | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Triumph | Volvo |
Model | 2000 | 120 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 84.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |