1965 Triumph 2000 vs. 1974 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1974 Triumph Stag is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Triumph Stag weights approximately 30 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Triumph Stag (235 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1974 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Triumph 2000 | 1974 Triumph Stag | |
Make | Triumph | Triumph |
Model | 2000 | Stag |
Year Released | 1965 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 63 L |