1965 Triumph 2000 vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1983 Toyota Celica is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Celica (115 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Toyota Celica (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Triumph 2000 | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Triumph | Toyota |
| Model | 2000 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 61 L |
