1965 Triumph 2000 vs. 1984 Volvo 360
To start off, 1984 Volvo 360 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Volvo 360 (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Volvo 360 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 54 kg more than 1984 Volvo 360.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Volvo 360 (160 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Volvo 360 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Triumph 2000 | 1984 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Triumph | Volvo |
Model | 2000 | 360 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 57 L |